by Mary Harrsch © 2025
While visiting Oxford in 2017, I photographed two anthropomorphic funerary urns dated to the sixth century BCE at the Ashmolean Museum. One urn’s portrait sculpture is highly abstract, while the other is strikingly realistic. The difference reflects not only artistic style but also geography and trade networks: Sarteano and Todi occupied distinct positions in central Italy with differing external influences.
Sarteano lies in the southern Chiusine area, where Villanovan traditions persisted longer. Todi, on the northern fringe of Etruscan territory near Umbria, was more open to external artistic influences — particularly Corinthian and early Greek Archaic naturalism spreading via Orvieto and Perugia.
The Sarteano urn represents a transitional stage in urn development. Its face is abstract, mask-like, and schematic, emphasizing the idea of the deceased rather than a true likeness. This reflects a symbolic or protective purpose, linking the deceased to an ancestor-focused belief system in which emphasis is on collective family or clan identity. The facial holes may have held metal appliqués or hair ornaments, and the simplified features recall the Villanovan ancestral mask tradition.
In contrast, the Todi urn, though approximately contemporary and often classified as Orientalizing, belongs to a more developed Archaic phase. It features naturalistic facial proportions, carefully shaped ears, and attempts to model hair texture and individual identity. This style reflects the Etruscan adoption of Hellenic ideals of form and beauty, as well as an increasing interest in the human body and realistic portraiture.
These urns foreshadow the reclining sarcophagi figures of the 5th–4th centuries BCE, such as the Sarcophagus of the Spouses. By the sixth century BCE, Etruscan sculptors in northern centers like Todi, Orvieto, and Perugia were exposed to Greek kouroi and korai through imported ceramics and itinerant artisans. These influences encouraged symmetry, proportion, rounded natural forms, and expressive individuality.
This evolution in artistic style parallels a cosmological shift. Funerary imagery increasingly blends ancestral reverence with broader religious cosmology: the deceased are envisioned as participants in a divine-human cosmos, not merely as household members. Across the Mediterranean, gods and mortals alike begin to appear in human form with relatable emotions, making both the afterlife and divine protection conceptually more accessible to the living.
References:
Brendel, O. J. (1995). Etruscan art. Yale University Press.
Carpino, A. (2016). The Sarcophagus of the Spouses: A terracotta portrait of Etruscan identity. In S. Bell & A. A. Carpino (Eds.), A companion to the Etruscans (pp. 219–231). Wiley-Blackwell.
Haynes, S. (2000). Etruscan civilization: A cultural history. J. Paul Getty Museum.
Izzet, V. (2007). The archaeology of Etruscan society. Cambridge University Press.
Spivey, N. (1997). Etruscan art. Thames & Hudson.
Steingräber, S. (2006). Abundance of life: Etruscan wall painting. J. Paul Getty Museum.
Torelli, M. (Ed.). (2000). The Etruscans. Bompiani.
Turfa, J. M. (Ed.). (2013). The Etruscan world. Routledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment